Samuel Gregg – on "Liberalism"

… The task of realizing the basic goods, however, need not always occur in a context of opposition to the temporal institutions in place. Catholics are certainly bound to oppose what the theologian Thomas Dubay describes as the dogmas of
materialism: “the primacy of pleasure, the invalidity of metaphysics, . . , the relativity of morality . . . the denial of freedom.” Insofar as liberal modernity
embraces these ideas or seeks to isolate man from all those unchosen aspects of
himself that are, in fact, prerequisites to his freedom, Catholics must never hesitate
to demonstrate their unreasonableness. The idea that man is nothing more
than a conglomerate of passions and that human fulfillment consists of merely
satisfying as many of those passions as possible in a short period of time, must
be resisted and refuted over and over again. This need not, however, mean that
those institutions commonly regarded as “liberal” — the market, the rule of law, a
constitutionally limited State, a flourishing set of civil associations — should be
considered inherently flawed by Catholics
.

The liberalism that is wanting is a set of claims about the human person
rather than its institutional associations. In part, this book has sought to show
how such institutions can be grounded in a vision that avoids the common liberal
reliance upon utilitarian assumptions. The task of achieving such a synthesis is
nothing less than a civilizational mission that Catholics are in a unique position
to foster.

By definition, this mission involves Catholics establishing themselves equidistant
between those who hold that all was darkness before 1789, and those who
believe that nothing but darkness has followed after 1789
. The inability of some
Catholics to do so has relegated them to the irrelevance of romantic nostalgia or
the triviality of aping secular modernity. Until such tendencies are overcome, the
ability of Catholics to contribute to the project of ordered liberty will continue to
languish in the realm of possibility rather than of actuality. And this is important,
for ultimately it is the free choices of many acting persons for this project that
will bring about its realization rather than the decisions of governments.

Samuel Gregg, On Ordered Liberty: A Treatise on the Free Society

On a related note

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s